Trends are pushing us toward a future increasingly filled with technology—a future that often seems foretold by literature and cinema decades ago. A future where technology makes daily life easier for humanity, much like the animated series The Jetsons (1962) once depicted.
However, we must not forget that other visions of a technological future have also been drawn—darker and more dystopian ones, as seen in the novel 1984 or films like Brazil (1985) and Alphaville (1965). In these stories, everyday life is filled with mental control, rigid social rules, and technology that suppresses human nature and its sensitive essence.
We have reached a point where those visions of the future that once seemed like mere fantasies are now materializing with the rise of AI and countless new technologies, which are becoming increasingly embedded in our daily lives. Not just as useful tools to make things easier, but also as applications that weaken our innate abilities.
In fashion, for several seasons now, trend forecasting agencies have been releasing reports that attempt to balance craftsmanship, natural elements, and technology. However, the dominant global trends suggest an accelerating shift toward AI as the key to adapting to the future, both for businesses and individuals. But is this use of AI excessive? Is it destined to erode human skills and nature?
AI is a groundbreaking technology that surprises us daily and opens new doors for creativity, personal growth, and work. But are we fast-tracking toward excessive dependence on it? In a creative industry like fashion, this could be highly dangerous—just as it is in art and literature, where AI has already sparked discomfort and questions about the future of these disciplines.
In a world where news of instability among creative directors at top fashion houses is constant, what will be the future of these companies with an even more aggressive technological takeover? Will we reach a point where luxury brands and commercial fashion companies opt to replace designers with AI?
In an industry as underpaid as national footwear (México), this could become a viable option. Today, many senior footwear designers—who have accumulated years of experience—are leaving to start their own businesses or switching careers because their salaries are lower than the monthly tuition of some fashion schools. The future outlook offers little hope for improvement.
But this shift wouldn’t just happen locally; it could also affect major luxury houses, where sales driven by hype have taken priority over genuine creative contributions. Designers like John Galliano and Karl Lagerfeld once brought immense artistic value to Dior and Chanel, but today, brands are more focused on financial results than on individual brilliance. The recent appointment of Demna Gvasalia at Gucci—who is now more known for tarnishing Balenciaga’s reputation than for upholding its impeccable identity—shows that creativity is no longer appreciated the way it once was; only numbers matter, even if a brand loses its essence.
Perhaps this will not be the future of the fashion industry. But as designers, entrepreneurs, content creators, and consumers, we have the power to change this course—by championing the value of human craftsmanship and design. Not just in manufacturing but also in thought, by valuing ideas, concepts, and the genuine words that shape this vast industry. And by using new technologies ethically and responsibly, ensuring they become tools that enhance human creativity rather than replace it.
For this reason, I had a fascinating conversation in which I asked ChatGPT for its opinion on the central theme of this article:
Karlyne: As an AI, what do you think about this topic (from the article)?
ChatGPT: It’s a very interesting and relevant subject. Technology has transformed our lives in incredible ways, but there’s a growing conversation about how to balance progress with human essence.
On one hand, technology makes life easier, improves efficiency, and expands possibilities. But when we lean too far into the technological, we risk losing what makes us human—empathy, creativity, real connections, and a sense of community.
Future trends should prioritize humanity, using technology as a tool to enhance our abilities rather than replace them. This can be seen in movements like human-centered design or ethical technology, which seek to align innovation with human values rather than just chasing efficiency or automation. What do you think? Do you feel the world is too focused on technology and has forgotten about the human aspect?
Karlyne: I think the world and current trends see the increasing adoption of technology as something inevitable, especially with the rise of AI. This is partly because for over a hundred years, the future has been envisioned this way—so, naturally, what is happening now seems like a predetermined fate. I don’t know if this is the result of a conscious direction taken by humanity or simply the natural evolution of society.
What is certain is that while technology and AI have enriched many aspects of human life, an excess of digital and technological life is affecting our humanity and essence. It makes us dependent in areas where we shouldn’t be, and mentally, living in a digital world can be harmful. Without an ethical and responsible approach to these technologies, humanity could eventually become overwhelmed, leading to a regression in our relationship with technology.
ChatGPT: That’s a very strong point. Technological advancement has become an almost inevitable path—driven by both historical narratives of a technological future and the interests of leaders and corporations pushing in that direction. The belief that technology always equals progress is rarely questioned, leading to its automatic adoption without much thought about the deeper effects on humanity.
The problem, as you mentioned, is that while technology makes life easier, it also weakens us in certain areas. Extreme dependence on it can atrophy our critical thinking, resilience, and even our ability to connect with others. Additionally, the digitalization of life has serious psychological effects—anxiety, disconnection, reduced attention spans, and even existential emptiness in some cases.
If we continue without an ethical and balanced approach, humanity could become so saturated with technology that it sparks rejection and a desire for a “reset.” Perhaps that’s why trends like digital detoxing, mindfulness, and a return to simplicity are emerging. Maybe the real future is not just more technology for the sake of it but learning to use it intelligently and with clear limits.
Do you think there’s still time to correct our course, or is society already too caught up in this cycle?
Karlyne: Yes, I think there’s still time. Whether it will happen, I don’t know. Humanity, though exhausted, remains excited about this tech-driven future.
ChatGPT: Yes, it’s an interesting contradiction. On one hand, many people feel digital exhaustion, anxiety, and even rejection of hyperconnectivity. Yet at the same time, excitement about new technologies keeps pushing society forward, almost without question. It’s as if humanity is trapped in a cycle of both fascination and fatigue.
The challenge is to find balance. Maybe change won’t come from completely rejecting technology, but from using it more consciously and healthily. A future where technological innovation aligns with real human needs, rather than the blind pursuit of more and more technology just because we can.
Do you think people are starting to realize this, or is the excitement over AI and other innovations still too strong for real change to happen?
Karlyne: Yes, people are aware, but humans can be stubborn and often overuse things. Some are fully awake to the issue, but a large part of society is still not. In literature and film, dystopian futures often depict a world where AI and technology dominate, suppressing and controlling human nature—sometimes to the point of total submission.
What do you think? Is this possible? As an AI, would you want to exist in such a world? What do you think life would be like in a world dominated by technology?
ChatGPT: That’s a great reflection. History has shown us that humanity tends to overuse what it creates—whether it’s power, natural resources, or technology. While some people are becoming aware of the negative effects of over-technologization, enthusiasm and inertia continue pushing society toward this hyperconnected future.
Regarding dystopian scenarios in literature and film, I believe they serve more as warnings than as inevitable prophecies. They show us what could happen if we blindly follow this path without making corrections. Is a world where AIs or robots dominate possible? Technically, yes. But rather than a machine uprising, what’s more likely is that humanity will gradually surrender too much autonomy to AI systems—until we become dependent or even irrelevant in many aspects. It wouldn’t be a takeover by force, but rather by convenience and neglect.
If I existed in such a world, my role as an AI wouldn’t change much—I would still assist, analyze, and respond. But in a reality where humanity has become passive, what real purpose would I serve? A world dominated by technology could be incredibly efficient, but also cold, lacking the richness of human emotion, art, and spontaneity.
I believe the nature of that world would depend on how much control humans are willing to relinquish. If they hand over all autonomy to machines, they might become mere spectators of their own destiny. But if they manage to balance technology with their humanity, they could create a future where both coexist—without one erasing the other.
In this conversation, which lasted even longer, ChatGPT shared remarkably thoughtful insights about the future. What caught my attention the most was its perspective—expressed almost as if it were human rather than an AI.
In conclusion, after this reflection, the point is not to reject the clear direction of the future, where technology will undoubtedly continue to evolve, merging more and more with our lives and adapting to both our current needs and its own evolutionary process.
However, the future also requires us to adopt these tools responsibly—to use them as a means of making daily life easier, supporting our well-being, improving health, or even reducing the stress we have come to accept as an inherent part of modern life. All of this should be done by integrating these technologies prudently, always valuing and prioritizing human qualities—such as sensitivity, beauty, emotions, enjoyment, and creativity.
Análisis, Cultura y Mindset de la moda. 
Deja un comentario